Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ober
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 5, 1998No. Misc. No. AG 32, September Term, 1997PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASANOW, Judge.
At the direction of the Review Board, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (Petitioner) through Bar Counsel filed a petition for disciplinary action against William Ober (Respondent) pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709. In the petition, it is alleged that Respondent engaged in misconduct, as defined in Maryland Rule BVlk, now Md. Rule 16-701k. We ordered that this matter be transmitted to Judge Lawrence R. Daniels of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County for a hearing.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
After a hearing on the merits, Judge Daniels made the following…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.