Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 20, 2014No. 63ag/13PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

I. The Story of the Straight-Forward Made Complicated

In this attorney disciplinary action, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner” or “the Commission”), acting through Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action (“PDRA”) against Gayton Joseph Thomas, Jr., Esquire (“Respondent” or “Thomas”), charging him with violations of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MLRPC”) arising out of his representation of Mohamed Abou Sarieh Hamed (“Hamed”). Respondent was charged with violating MLRPC 1.1 (Competence),1 1.3 (Diligence),2 1.4…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AllenbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  2. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Attorney Grievance v. Smith-ScottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ChanthunyaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Attorney Grievance v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API