Attorney Grievance Commission v. Garfield
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
HARRELL, Judge.
Pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709(a) 1 , Bar Counsel, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission (Petitioner) and at the behest of the Review Board, filed with this Court a petition for disciplinary action against Craig Steven Garfield, Esquire (Respondent). 2 In the petition, Bar Counsel alleged violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC) 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.16, and 8.4(d) in connection with Respondent’s representation of Artinus Shands 3 , Darron C. Addison, Lillian Johnson, Samuel C. Veney, Drucella Mann, Diane Postal, and Robert Yinger (the latter in two…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DiCiccoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.