Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kapoor
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner”), acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751, 1 filed two Petitions For Disciplinary Or Remedial Action against Respondent, Eric Jag Kapoor, on April 4 and May 6, 2005, respectively. The Petitions allege that Respondent, who was admitted to the Bar of this Court on December 11, 2001, violated several Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”), specifically, 1.1 (Competence), 2 1.2 (Scope of Rep-reservation), 3 1.3 (Diligence), 4 1.4 (Communication), 5 1.5 (Fees), 6 1.15 (Safekeeping Property), 7 Rule 3.3(a) (Candor Toward the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cherry-MahoiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.