Krotin v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
This is an action arising under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Civil Code section 1790 et seq., commonly referred to as California’s “lemon law” (hereinafter, the Act). The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court prejudicially erred in instructing the jury that the lessee of a vehicle “who justifiably rejects or revokes acceptance of a vehicle must do so within a reasonable time after the lessee discovers the grounds for rejection or revocation.” We find that to establish breach of warranty obligations under the Act, a formal rejection or revocation of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Mitchell v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Krieger v. Nick Alexander Imports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Lemons v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Oregel v. AMERICAN ISUZU MOTORS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Mocek v. Alfa Leisure, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- GAB Business Services, Inc. v. Lindsey & Newsom Claim Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Logacz v. LimanskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.