Legal Opinion
Oregel v. AMERICAN ISUZU MOTORS, INC.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 2001No. D036615PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDONALD, J.
Respondent Marcelino Oregel leased a new 1998 Isuzu Rodeo (the car) manufactured by appellant American Isuzu Motors, Inc. (Isuzu). Approximately one year later Oregel demanded, pursuant to the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq., hereafter the Act), that Isuzu repurchase the car, claiming it had a chronic oil leak that Isuzu was unable to fix. Isuzu declined to repurchase the car and Oregel filed this lawsuit alleging Isuzu willfully violated its obligations under the Act. The jury found in favor of Oregel. Isuzu argues the jury’s verdict is not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Kuhn v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Jensen v. BMW of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Robertson v. Fleetwood Travel Trailers of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- ASP Properties Group, L.P. v. Fard, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Goehring v. Chapman UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.