Legal Opinion

Mocek v. Alfa Leisure, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 2003No. G031180PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J .

Defendant Alfa Leisure, Inc. appeals from a judgment following a bench trial. The action arose from the purchase of a travel trailer by plaintiff Frank Mocek, now deceased. (Although the administrator of Mr. Mocek’s estate has substituted in as plaintiff, we refer to Mocek as “plaintiff.”) The trial court found that defects in the trailer constituted a breach of the implied warranty of merchantability and rendered a judgment in the amount of the purchase price, plus interest, conditioned upon plaintiff returning the trailer to defendant.

The trial court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Krieger v. Nick Alexander Imports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Krotin v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Young v. GannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Souza v. LauppeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Birdsong v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  4. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  5. Cholakyan v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API