Legal Opinion

Soule v. General Motors Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1994No. S033144PublishedCited by 528 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*556Opinion

BAXTER, J.

—Plaintiff’s ankles were badly injured when her General Motors (GM) car collided with another vehicle. She sued GM, asserting that defects in her automobile allowed its left front wheel to break free, collapse rearward, and smash the floorboard into her feet. GM denied any defect and claimed that the force of the collision itself was the sole cause of the injuries. Expert witnesses debated the issues at length. Plaintiff prevailed at trial, and the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment.

We granted review to resolve three questions. First, may a product’s design be found…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by528 opinions

  1. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

523 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API