Mitchell v. Gonzales
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LUCAS, C. J.
In this case we decide whether BAJI No. 3.75,1 the so-called proximate cause instruction, which contains a “but for” test of cause in fact, should continue to be given in this state, or whether it should be disapproved in favor of BAJI No. 3.76, the so-called legal cause instruction, which employs the “substantial factor” test of cause in fact.2
Plaintiffs James and Joyce Mitchell, the parents of 12-year-old Damechie Mitchell, who drowned in Lake Gregory on July 4, 1985, sued defendants Jose L. Gonzales, Matilde Gonzales, and Mrs. Gonzales’s son Luis (hereafter defendants)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Lemons v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Doupnik v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by157 opinions
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- Ileto v. Glock Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.