Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Gonzales

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1991No. S018678PublishedCited by 157 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

In this case we decide whether BAJI No. 3.75,1 the so-called proximate cause instruction, which contains a “but for” test of cause in fact, should continue to be given in this state, or whether it should be disapproved in favor of BAJI No. 3.76, the so-called legal cause instruction, which employs the “substantial factor” test of cause in fact.2

Plaintiffs James and Joyce Mitchell, the parents of 12-year-old Damechie Mitchell, who drowned in Lake Gregory on July 4, 1985, sued defendants Jose L. Gonzales, Matilde Gonzales, and Mrs. Gonzales’s son Luis (hereafter defendants)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Lemons v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Doupnik v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by157 opinions

  1. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Ileto v. Glock Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997

152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API