Legal Opinion

GAB Business Services, Inc. v. Lindsey & Newsom Claim Services, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 2000No. G021350PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.—

Introduction

GAB Business Services, Inc. (GAB) sued its former officer and employee, C. Randall (Randy) Neal, and Neal’s new employer, Lindsey & Newsom Claim Services, Inc. (Lindsey), for their respective roles in soliciting 17 key GAB employees to resign en masse in order to join Neal in new positions at Lindsey. GAB claimed Neal breached his fiduciary duty in orchestrating the exodus while still an officer at GAB. GAB accused its competitor Lindsey of unfair competition in assisting and benefiting from Neal’s breach of fiduciary duty. GAB also sued both Neal and Lindsey…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  4. Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. In Re Gregory Dewitt Cantrell, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Reeves v. HanlonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Oakland Raiders v. National Football LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Das v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Aon Consulting v. Midlands FinancialNebraska Supreme Court · 2008

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API