Legal Opinion

Howard Contracting, Inc. v. G.A. MacDonald Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 1999No. B115886PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOLAND, J. *

Summary

A general contractor on a public works construction project is permitted by statute to recover damages arising out of delays attributable to a municipality’s acts or omissions, notwithstanding the municipality’s status as a charter city and a clause in the contract precluding an award of damages for delay. Further, a subcontractor on the project who seeks to prosecute a claim for delay damages on a pass-through basis has standing as an aggrieved party to appeal and is entitled to offer evidence to support the claim.

Background

I. Project

This case arises out of a public…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Stratton v. First National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Souza & McCue Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Nagel v. Twin Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Interstate Contracting Corp. v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Nagel v. Twin Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Belton v. Comcast Cable Holdings, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Davis v. Fresno Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API