Howard Contracting, Inc. v. G.A. MacDonald Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOLAND, J. *
Summary
A general contractor on a public works construction project is permitted by statute to recover damages arising out of delays attributable to a municipality’s acts or omissions, notwithstanding the municipality’s status as a charter city and a clause in the contract precluding an award of damages for delay. Further, a subcontractor on the project who seeks to prosecute a claim for delay damages on a pass-through basis has standing as an aggrieved party to appeal and is entitled to offer evidence to support the claim.
Background
I. Project
This case arises out of a public…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Stratton v. First National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Souza & McCue Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Nagel v. Twin Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Interstate Contracting Corp. v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Nagel v. Twin Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Belton v. Comcast Cable Holdings, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Davis v. Fresno Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.