Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Covell

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1933No. Docket No. Sac. 4428PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The cross-appeals involved herein are from a judgment establishing a balance due from the defendant, George F. Covell, to the plaintiffs, C. H. Hansen and Joseph C. Buchen, contractors under a building construction contract. The contractors sought to recover unpaid balances under the contract plus certain items of extras and damages alleged to be due from said defendant, who is the owner of the property involved. A cross-complaint was filed by Covell against the contractors alleging abandonment on the part of the contractors and the cost of completion by said defendant for which he sought…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Perry v. MagnesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Excelsior Terra Cotta Co. v. . HardeNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Goss v. Northern Pacific Hospital Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Healy v. FallonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Chester C. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant/appellant v. Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Chester C. Davis, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and Martin Cook, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants/appellees. Summa Corporation, Hughes Aircraft Corporation, Defendants- Counterclaimants/appellants v. Chester C. Davis, Davis & Cox, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and D. Martin Cook, Counterdefendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API