O'MORROW v. Borad
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Following a collision between two automobiles, Jack Borad, who was driving one of the cars at the time of the accident, sued W. D. O’Morrow, the operator of the other vehicle. Under complementary policies, each of these persons was insured by Firemen’s Insurance Company and The Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company against liability for damages resulting from such accident. Through counsel selected by him, 0 ’Morrow filed a cross-complaint in which he claimed damages against Borad. O’Morrow then notified the insurers that these attorneys would also present his defense to Borad’s cause of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Gray v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Estado Libre Asociado v. AguayoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
- Tomerlin v. Canadian Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Redevelopment Agency v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. FosterMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.