Wilmeth v. Lee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
CARLILE, Justice.
This action was brought to recover the balance due for services rendered defendant by the plaintiffs as attorneys. The record discloses that on a Saturday evening-in September, 1954 plaintiff Lee went to the home of defendant and conferred with him and his wife relative to filing a divorce action. Having received the necessary information, on the following Monday morning he drew the petition and a waiver of service of summons. On advice of the husband that he and his wife had become reconciled the papers were never filed. No action for divorce was ever commenced. On the 12th…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Lapp-Gifford Co. v. Muscoy Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Johnston v. BurnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Kubatzky v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. RichterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marton Remodeling v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Rush v. G-K MacHinery Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1961
- Polin v. American Petrofina Co. of TexasCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
- Continental Natural Gas, Inc. v. Midcoast Natural Gas, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
- Trane Company v. BEARDEN PLUMBING & HEATINGCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969