Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Richter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
This is a suit on an accident policy. In appealing from an adverse judgment of the lower court, wherein plaintiff recovered judgment for total disability from March 20, .1931, to June 19, 1932, less a payment received, the principal contention of the' defendant insurance company is that it .completely and finally settled with the plaintiff, shortly after the accident.
Plaintiff was a supervising architect. His ,'work .was the drawing of' plans and actual supervision of the construction following such plans, requiring considerable climbing and other physical activity incident to proper…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ozark Mutual Life Ass'n v. WinchesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Kubatzky v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Sherman v. Pacific Coast Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Creek Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Great Northern Life Ins. v. Farmers' Union Co-Operative Gin Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Markel Service, Inc. v. National Farm LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Grayhill Drilling Co. v. Superior Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. RichterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.