Legal Opinion

Rush v. G-K MacHinery Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1961No. 9024PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Appellant brought this action seeking to recover a balance of moneys allegedly due and owing from respondent growing out of the sales of two pieces of heavy equipment — a crane and a dump truck. The crane was peaceably repossessed under a defaulted conditional sales contract, and the truck, encumbered by a mortgage as additional security for payment of the contract, was peaceably delivered for sale.

A dispute arose out of the settlement on the sales of the equipment. Appellant asserted there was still due and owing $4,-340.05 from the sale of the crane and $3,345.00 from the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Virginia-Carolina Electrical Works, Inc. v. CooperSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  4. Edgar v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Clay v. RossiIdaho Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Arrington Construction CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Cook v. SoltmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Boesiger v. DeModenaIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hellickson v. JenkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Gardner v. HollifieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API