Legal Opinion
Continental Natural Gas, Inc. v. Midcoast Natural Gas, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 10, 1996No. 85922PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOPLIN, Judge:
AppellanVcounter-appellee Midcoast Natural Gas, Inc. (Mideoast) seeks review of the trial court’s orders denying Midcoast’s motions for summary judgment, directed verdict and judgment non obstante verdicto, and awarding Appellee/eounter-appellant Continental Natural Gas, Inc. (Continental) attorney fees after judgment on jury verdict for Continental in Continental’s action for recovery of value of natural gas allegedly sold and delivered under contract, alleging error of the trial court (1) denying Midcoast’s motions for summary judgmenVdirected verdict/judgment n.o.v.,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Middlebrook v. Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.'s, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Barnes v. HelfenbeinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tibbetts v. Sight 'N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Acting in Its Corporate Capacity v. Sandra B. Hamilton and L.G. Hamilton, Individuals v. Ncnb Texas National Bank, and Nationsbank, Successor in Interest to Ncnb Texas National Bank, Defendant-Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Atkinson v. AtkinsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.