Legal Opinion

Trane Company v. BEARDEN PLUMBING & HEATING

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 30, 1969No. 42161PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

This case involves an action by plaintiff in error, described herein as Trane, or as plaintiff, against defendant in error, described herein as Bearden, to recover a balance alleged to be due on an account for supplies purchased from Trane by Bearden. Bearden denied liability alleging the defense of an accord and satisfaction. Jury verdict, and judgment thereon, was entered for the defendant.

Reveo Construction Company (Reveo) was prime contractor in the construction of a public school building in Tulsa. Bearden was a subcontractor. His surety was TriState Insurance Company,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Wilmeth v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Dawson v. CobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Hollem & Truitt Lbr. Co. v. Medicine Park Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. R. Fulton, D/B/A J. R. Fulton & Company v. L & N Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  2. J. R. Fulton, D/B/A J. R. Fulton & Company v. L & N Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API