Legal Opinion

Marton Remodeling v. Jensen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1985No. 18400, 18401PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These appeals are from a judgment entered in an action brought by the plaintiff, Marton Remodeling, to foreclose a mechanic's lien which it had filed against a house and lot owned by the defendant, Mark Jensen, for $6,538.12 which it claimed was due it for remodeling. Judgment was entered on a jury verdict for $1,538, together with $1,000 punitive damages, and attorney fees of $5,950.24. The trial court remitted the award of punitive damages and reduced the attorney fees by 50 percent to $2,976.12. Jensen appeals from that judgment in case No. 18400, and in case No. 18401, Marton appeals,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Jahn v. BurnsWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Sugarhouse Finance Co. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Department of Fisheries v. J-Z Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. Flambeau Products Corp. v. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. ProMax Development Corp. v. RaileUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. County Fire Door Corp. v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Estate Landscape & Snow Removal Specialists, Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Vali Convalescent & Care Institutions v. Division of Health Care FinancingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. Acierno v. Worthy Brothers Pipeline Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API