Legal Opinion
Coombes v. Getz
California Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 13939PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This case was before us upon a motion to dismiss the appeal (213 Cal. 164 [1 Pac. (2d) 992, 4 Pac. (2d) 157]) and also before the Supreme Court of the United States (Coombes v. Getz, 285 U. S. 434 [52 Sup. Ct. Rep. 435, 76 L. Ed. 866]) on a writ of certiorari taken to said court for the purpose of reviewing the order of this court dismissing said appeal. Said order of dismissal was made by this court on the ground that section 3 of article XII of the state Constitution, upon which the plaintiff relies as authority for the maintenance of this action, had since its commencement been repealed by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Hayden v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Timberidge Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Usher v. Department of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Burt v. Irvine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- De Malherbe v. International Union of Elevator ConstructorsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Woodard v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.