Legal Opinion
De Malherbe v. International Union of Elevator Constructors
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 12, 1978No. C-76-1668-CBRPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
RENFREW, District Judge.
Defendants’ motions to dismiss require the Court to decide whether plaintiff’s im plied cause of action for damages under the Constitution is barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The factual and procedural background of this action is described in detail in the Court’s earlier Memorandum of Opinion filed herein on September 28, 1977 (438 F.Supp. 1121 (N.D.Cal.1977)). Plaintiff claims that defendants deprived him of employment opportunities because he is an alien. His claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Edgar Pauk v. The Board of Trustees of the City University of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Claf McClam v. Mayor Marion Barry, Municipality of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Stuart v. Pingree (In Re Afco Development Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1986
- In Re Olympia Brewing Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Marshall v. KleppeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.