Legal Opinion

Woodard v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1940PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover damages sustained on account of certain letters — alleged to be false and malicious — written by defendant of and concerning the title to plaintiff’s property. It is generally denominated — although some text writers say improperly — as an action for slander of title. From a judgment based on the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $3,380.85 special damages and the sum of $2,055 punitive damages, the defendant appeals.

A brief statement of the case will suffice for the purpose of determining whether the action is barred by the statute of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burkett v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Buehrer v. Provident Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. King v. PaulyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Coombes v. GetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Jones v. BarmmIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Bonner v. Chicago Title InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Usher v. Department of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Old Plantation Corp. v. Maule IndustriesSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Huffstutter v. LindOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Henry V. Vaccaro Construction Co. v. A. J. DePace, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API