Legal Opinion

State v. DeSart

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 13, 1984No. C0-84-1352PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

This is an appeal by the State of Minnesota pursuant to Rule 28.04 of the Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure challenging a pretrial order of the Freeborn District Court. The trial court dismissed a charge against respondent DeSart for driving while under the influence of alcohol in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subds. 1(a) and (d) (1982). The trial court concluded the arresting officer did not have sufficient reasons for stopping respondent’s motorcycle and, as a result, suppressed all evidence obtained subsequent to the stop. We reverse and remand for trial.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. KvamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. State v. SpeakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. State v. BarberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Shull v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. In Re the License Revocation of HerreraSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. DeRoseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. CapersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API