Legal Opinion

State v. Capers

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 20, 1990No. C7-89-704PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant was charged with first degree burglary in one incident and with financial transaction card fraud in another. The fraud charge was submitted to the court on the record; the burglary charge was tried to a jury. Appellant, then on probation following a conviction on another charge, was convicted on both charges and sentenced; his probation was revoked. Appellant alleges that the evidence was insufficient to identify him as the perpetrator of the burglary and that he was illegally stopped after the fraudulent transaction, in violation of his fourth amendment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. BurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of E.D.J.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API