Legal Opinion
State v. Kvam
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 22, 1983No. C1-82-1596PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
This is a pretrial appeal by the state, pursuant to Minn.R.Crim.P. 29.03, from an order of the district court suppressing evidence and then dismissing the prosecution of the defendant for the gross misdemeanor offense of aggravated driving while under the influence, Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 3(a) (1982). The basic issue raised is whether the trial court erred in ruling that the police violated defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights in stopping him. We reverse and remand for trial.
The state’s sole witness at the omnibus hearing was Officer Mark Robideau of the Rosemount Police…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. KinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- State v. BinetteTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.