Legal Opinion

State v. DeRose

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 2, 1985No. C8-84-1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Defendants were charged with burglary in the second degree under Minn.Stat. § 609.582, subd. 2(d) (Supp.1983). The trial court dismissed the criminal complaints against defendants and suppressed all evidence resulting from a stop and search and seizure of the car defendants were riding in. The trial court did not make written or oral findings as required by Minn.R. Crim.P. 11.07. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

At approximately 3:14 a.m. on April 30, 1984, Pine County Deputy Sheriff Brett Grinde responded to a silent burglar alarm from the Outdoorsman Sporting Goods…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. State v. SpeakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. ClaussenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. DeSartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Appelgate v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. ReanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API