Legal Opinion
Shull v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 23, 1986No. C7-86-901PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Appellant Max Shull’s driving privileges were revoked for violation of the implied consent law. He petitioned for judicial review, and the trial court sustained the revocation. He appeals, contending that the trial court erred. We affirm.
FACTS
On December 29, 1985, at approximately 12:45 a.m., Officer Michael Alexander, a Wabasha County deputy sheriff, observed a motor vehicle being driven by Shull on County Road 21. Although the road was snowpacked and icy, Alexander observed that Shull’s vehicle was traveling slower than necessary in view of the road conditions and was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. EngholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. SpeakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Grafton v. SwansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. DahlheimerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. BrechlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- DeBoer v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.