Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1977No. 46176PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, charged with felonious theft and burglary, attempted at the Rasmussen hearing to have the physical evidence against him suppressed on the ground that it was the fruit of a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. The district court denied the motion and defendant, apparently believing that his only hope was in challenging the suppression order on appeal from final judgment, waived a jury and agreed to submit the issue of his guilt to the court on a stipulation as to what the state’s witnesses would testify to if called. Defendant’s convictions and this appeal followed. We reverse…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. State v. WiegandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. State v. BrittonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. State v. EngholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API