State v. Barber
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Todd, Justice.
On stipulated facts defendant was found guilty by a St. Paul municipal court judge of driving after revocation in violation of Minn. St. 171.24. The issue on this appeal from judgment of conviction is whether the highway patrolman who stopped defendant had sufficient justification for doing so. We hold that the patrolman acted properly in stopping defendant, and accordingly we affirm.
At 1:15 p. m. on November 27, 1974, Officer William Henry of the Minnesota Highway Patrol observed defendant and a companion proceeding north on Interstate Highway No. 35, north of downtown St.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- City of St. Paul v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. DiedeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. BrittonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. PleasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.