United States v. Tavolilla
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Quinn, Chief Judge:
A divided board of review set aside the accused’s conviction for wrongful appropriation of an automobile and breach of restriction, in violation of Articles 121 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 921 and 934, respectively, on the ground he was denied assistance of counsel. Pursuant to Article 67(b)(2), Code, supra, 10 USC § 867, the Judge Advocate General of the Army certified the following question for this Court’s consideration:
Was the board of review correct in setting aside the findings of guilty and the sentence?
The accused was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. TibbsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
- United States v. TellierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. CambridgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. KitchensUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
- United States v. MasseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. HollandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. EasonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. JeanbaptisteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. MurrayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.