Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Eason

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 21, 1972No. 24,770PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

-Opinion of the Court

Duncan, Judge:

This case is before us on the following question, certified by the acting Judge Advocate General:

“Was the United States Navy Court of Military Review correct in its determination that the Government was required as a matter of law to make Captain Provine available to represent the accused?”

The basic facts are these. One or two days after the alleged occurrences Captain Provine was appointed to represent the appellant as defense counsel. A satisfactory attorney-client relationship was established, with counsel conferring frequently, almost daily, with his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. TellierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  2. United States v. VanderpoolUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. MurrayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  4. United States v. CuttingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  5. United States v. KinardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. United States v. IversonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. CattUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. GnibusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. BacaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API