Legal Opinion

United States v. Tibbs

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 7, 1965No. 18,166PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused contends the law officer erred to his prejudice by relying upon an incorrect rule of law to deny a defense motion to dismiss the charges because of inexcusable delay in prosecution.

At his arraignment, on charges of housebreaking and attempted larceny of property on two separate occasions, in violation of Articles 130 and 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 930 and 880, respectively, the accused entered a plea of guilty. *352The law officer recessed the open court proceedings to inquire into the voluntariness of the plea. In the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. HounshellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  2. United States v. SchalckUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  3. United States v. CallahanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  4. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. CruzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. United States v. KossmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. MizgalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  3. United States v. CummingsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  4. United States v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  5. United States v. CossioCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API