Ciarlelli v. TOWN OF HAMDEN
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1ConcurrenceZarella, J.
I agree with the result reached by the majority. I write separately, however, because, in my view, nothing in General Statutes § 7-433c1 requires that notice of hypertension or heart disease be given to a municipal employer within a specified period of time in order for a claimant to receive compensation. I am aware that our precedent has repeatedly *302interpreted § 7-433c to require claimants to comply with the notice provisions relating to accidental injuries contained in the Workers’ Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-294c (a);2 see, e.g., Collins v. West Haven, 210 Conn. 423, 430,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Barden v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Bellemare v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Town of Plainville v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.