Legal Opinion
Ciarlelli v. TOWN OF HAMDEN
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 21, 2010No. SC 18201Published
1Opinion of the Court
8 A.3d 1093 (2010)
299 Conn. 265
David CIARLELLI
v.
TOWN OF HAMDEN et al.
No. 18201.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Argued January 9, 2009.
Decided December 21, 2010.
Andrew J. Morrissey, Naugatuck, with whom was Jill Morrissey, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Jason M. Dodge, with whom was Heather K. Porto, Glastonbury, for the appellees (defendants).
ROGERS, C.J., and NORCOTT, KATZ, PALMER and ZARELLA, Js.[*]
PALMER, J.
This appeal requires us to determine when the one year limitation period of General Statutes § 31-294c (a)[1] begins to run on a claim for hypertension benefits under General Statutes §…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Barden v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Bakelaar v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Ducharme v. City of PutnamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.