Legal Opinion

Windsor Pacific LLC v. Samwood Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 2013No. B233514PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*266Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

Windsor Pacific LLC (Windsor) seeks to establish a prescriptive easement over two access roads on undeveloped land in northern Los Angeles County owned by Samwood Co., Inc. (Samwood), and Shadow Pines, LLC (Shadow). Windsor used the roads for several years with Shadow’s permission and pursuant to a written easement agreement with Shadow. The trial court, after a nonjury trial, granted judgment in favor of both Shadow and Samwood, holding that Windsor’s use of the roads did not create a prescriptive easement over either the Samwood property or the Shadow property because…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Platt Pacific, Inc. v. AndelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Strong v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Mountain Air Enters., LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Schafer v. City of Los Angeles CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Owens v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Tract 19051 Homeowners Assn. v. KempCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. McBride v. Smith, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API