Legal Opinion

O'BANION v. Borba

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1948No. S. F. 17362PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment declaring plaintiffs to be the owners of easements for roads and a ditch across land owned by defendants.

The trial court found that plaintiffs are the owners of a described right of way or road (hereinafter called first easement) across defendants’ land designated Parcel A, and of a described right of way for a ditch, and road along it (hereafter called second easement) across defendants’ land designated as Parcel B.

Plaintiffs acquired parcels of land in 1933 and 1938. Defendants acquired their Parcels A and B in 1945 from Miller and Lux, Incorporated, the…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Kripp v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Rice v. California Lutheran HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Thomas v. EnglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Gion v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. SayigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Lynch v. GlassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API