Legal Opinion

City of New London v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Waterford

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 3, 1992No. 10307PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The defendant Waterford zoning board of appeals appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal of the plaintiffs, the city of New London and the New London police department (New London). The trial court concluded that the decision of the board limiting the term “municipal facilities,” as used in the Waterford zoning regulations § 6.2.4,1 to municipal facilities of the town of Waterford was illegal. On appeal to this court, the board claims that the trial court improperly substituted its judgment for that of the board by concluding that the term “municipal facility” means…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. LammeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Donohue v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. UlenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Doyen v. Zoning Board of Appeals of EssexConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Borden v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Amore v. FrankelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. Delfino v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API