Legal Opinion
Borden v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 27, 2000No. AC 18864PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Mildred B. Borden, appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing her appeal from the granting by the defendant planning and zoning commission of the town of North Stonington (commission) of the application for site plan approval filed by the defendant Connecticut Hospital Management Corporation, doing business as Stonington Institute (institute). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly granted the institute’s motion to dismiss her appeal on the ground that she had failed to exhaust her available administrative remedy of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Upson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Connecticut Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Berlin Batting Cages, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Grasso v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Groton Long Point Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Hasychak v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Balf Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.