Legal Opinion
State v. Lamme
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 7, 1990No. 13792PublishedCited by 156 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the provisions of article first, § 9,1 of the Connecticut constitution preclude the police from detaining a person for limited investigative purposes without having probable cause to arrest. The state charged the defendant, Richard Lamme, with the operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and with the operation of a motor vehicle while his license was under suspension, in violation of General *174Statutes §§ 14-227a (a) and 14-215 (a), respectively.2 The defendant unsuccessfully moved, prior to trial, for the suppression…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by156 opinions
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. FerreiraIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.