Legal Opinion

Delfino v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 23, 1993No. 11218; 11220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

The defendants, the planning and zoning commission of the city of Torrington (commission) and Joseph J. Ficca, appeal from a decision of the trial court sustaining the plaintiffs’1 appeal from a change of zone granted to Ficca. The defendants claim that the trial court improperly sustained the plaintiffs’ appeal upon finding that the commission lacked subject matter jurisdiction because it failed to comply properly with the notice requirements of General Statutes § 8-3b.2 The plaintiffs argue, however, that even if this *456court were to reverse the decision of the trial court on this notice…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. State v. ReaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. State v. CopelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Capurso v. FlisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Polymer Resources, Ltd. v. KeeneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Karantonis v. Town of East HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Lauver v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. A. Aiudi & Sons, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Bosley v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API