Legal Opinion

In Re Bielec

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 2000No. 97-BG-1507PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent James A. Bielec is an attorney admitted to the bars of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the District of Columbia. After he entered into a consent decree with a judge of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, voluntarily agreeing to the striking of his name from the roll of attorneys eligible to practice before that court, the Board of Professional Responsibility (Board) recommended that this court not impose any reciprocal discipline, finding that to do so would result in a deprivation of respondent’s right to due process of law. We agree with the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. In Re GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re GreenspanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. In Re WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. In Re SchoenemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. In re WinsteadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. In Re MaxwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API