Legal Opinion
In Re Maxwell
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 23, 2002No. 00-BG-221PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge.
Respondent (hereafter Maxwell) consented to a public reprimand by the Court of Appeals of Maryland for ethical violations consisting primarily of conflicts of interest. In doing so, he admitted that the underlying conduct took place in 1986 and 1987 and was “addressed to [sic]” a civil lawsuit in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia that had resulted in (a) an opinion of the trial court issued in October 1995 and (b) an opinion of this court following appeal. The Maryland order of discipline rested on no other factual predicate.
In the present reciprocal…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re HoldmannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re CloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re DittonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In re Estate of BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re MaxwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.