Legal Opinion
In Re Schoeneman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 26, 2001No. 99-BG-477PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
After a complaint was filed with the Virginia State Bar alleging that Charles Schoeneman had neglected a case and failed to keep his client informed of its progress, Schoeneman chose not to contest the allegation, and surrendered his license to practice law in Virginia. Because a resignation in the face of pending charges of misconduct is a form of bar discipline, see In re Day, 717 A.2d 883, 888 (D.C. 1998), the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that Schoeneman be suspended from the District of Columbia Bar as a reciprocal matter, with leave to apply for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re Olekanma A. Ekekwe-KauffmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In Re SchoenemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re Seth Adam RobbinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- In Re SchoenemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.