Legal Opinion
Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 31, 2012No. Consol. 11-00533PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Chief Judge POGUE:
This is a consolidated action seeking review of determinations made by the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the Department”) in the countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigation of multilayered wood flooring from the People’s Republic of China (“China”). 2 Currently before the court is Plaintiffs’ Rule 56.2 Motion for Judgment, on the Agency Record. In their motion, Plaintiffs challenge three aspects of Commerce’s Final Determination: (1) Commerce’s use of adverse facts available (“AFA”) in determining the benchmark rate for calculating the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Husteel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.