Legal Opinion

Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 23, 2014No. 2013-1158, 2013-1174, 2013-1172, 2013-1173PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

This is a countervailing duty (“CVD”) case under the United States’ trade laws. It involves the application of adverse inferences in a CVD investigation when a party fails to provide requested information.

Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited, et al. (referred to hereafter collectively as “Fine Furniture”), is a producer of hardwood flooring in China, whose flooring material is imported into the United States. In response to a petition by domestic industries, the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) instituted a CVD investigation of multilayered wood flooring in China.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Eurodif S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Essar Steel Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  4. Changshou Wujin Fine Chemical Factory Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  5. Kyd, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Mueller Comercial De Mexico, S. De R.L. De C v. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  3. Mukand, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. JBF RAK LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  5. Posco v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API