Legal Opinion
Husteel Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 2, 2015No. Consol. 14-00215PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
This action challenges the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) final determination rendered in the antidumping (“AD”) duty investigation of certain oil country tubular goods (“OCTG”) 1 from the Republic of Korea (“Korea”). See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Negative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 Fed.Reg. 41,983 (Dep’t Commerce July 18, 2014) (“Final Determination”). Before the court are the motions for judgment on the agency record of Korean producers Husteel…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Maverick Tube Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Hyundai Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.