Legal Opinion
Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 30, 2016No. Consol. 15-00068PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Kelly, Judge:
This consolidated action arises from the final affirmative determination made by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or • “DOC”) in its countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigation of certain solar panels from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or “China”). 1 See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from the [PRC], 79 Fed. Reg. 76,962 (Dep’t Commerce Dec. 23, 2014) (final affirmative countervailing duty determination) (“Final Determination”) and accompanying Issues & Decision Mem., C-570-011, Investigation, PD 388, bar code 3247469-01 (Dec.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Posco v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Clearon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- POSCO v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- POSCO v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.