Legal Opinion
Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 28, 2013No. Consol. 11-00537PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARZILAY, Senior Judge:
This matter comes before the court on the motions for judgment on the agency record filed pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2 by Plaintiffs Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill, Incorporated, and Tate & Lyle Americas, LLC (“Petitioners”) and Consolidated Plaintiffs RZBC Co., Ltd. (“RZBC Co.”), RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd., and RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd. (“RZBC Juxian”) (collectively “RZBC”). The Petitioners and RZBC seek review of the final results of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) first administrative review of the countervailing duty order on citric…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Essar Steel Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Guizhou Tyre Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- RZBC Group Shareholding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Clearon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.