Legal Opinion

Hartnett v. Boston Store

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1914PublishedCited by 72 opinions

Appeal from the Branch “D” Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that .court on writ of error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Albert C. Barnes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chile Justice Cartwright

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal granted on a certificate of importance-by the Appellate Court for the First District from a judgment- of that court affirming a judgment of the superior court of Cook county in an action on the case brought by Mary Hartnett, appellant, against the Boston Store of Chicago,, appellee, to recover damages alleged to have resulted from a violation of an ordinance of the city of Chicago which forbids the sale of fire-arms to minors. The judgment was in favor of the defendant and was entered on a verdict of the jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buckstaff v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Weick v. LanderIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Matthews v. GrangerIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Chicago Hair & Bristle Co. v. MuellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. First Springfield Bank & Trust v. GalmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Neering v. I.C.R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. LynchIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Greene v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Young v. Bryco ArmsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API