Paugh v. Hanks
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
Based on our recent pronouncement in Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co. (1983), 4 Ohio St. 3d 131, we hold that summary judgments in the instant cause were improper and that, therefore, the cause must be reversed and remanded to the court of common pleas, since the plaintiffs here have stated a cause of action for the negligent infliction of serious emotional distress. Upon remand, we wish to guide the trial court, as well as the bench and bar, as to the limitations and scope of Ohio’s recognition of the tort of negligent infliction of serious emotional distress.
Today, this court has the unique…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by360 opinions
- Lucas Burgess v. Gene FischerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
355 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.